1. Strategic Threat IndexClassification: Unclassified / Open SourceResearch Environment
STIStrategic Threat Index
Research — Open Source

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED — HISTORICAL RESEARCH VIEW — IMAGERY AVAILABILITY DEPENDS ON PROVIDER PROCESSING — NO REAL-TIME TRACKING — NO OPERATIONAL TARGETING.

Threat Profiles
Islamic Republic of Iran
🇮🇷
Tier 2Middle East

Islamic Republic of Iran

© Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics
Tier 2Middle East

Islamic Republic of Iran

Regional threat; ballistic missile and proxy network concern

Data vintage: 2026-04-27
Source: SIPRI / IISS / CRS
Executive SummaryBottom-line intelligence assessment

Iran poses a significant regional threat through its ballistic missile programme, proxy networks (Hezbollah, Houthis, Iraqi PMF), and expanding drone capabilities. Iran's nuclear programme remains a major proliferation concern. It provides weapons and technology to Russia for use in Ukraine while using off-budget channels to sustain missile and drone programmes despite economic pressure.

Key Assessment

Iran's advanced ballistic missile arsenal and large drone inventory remain the most significant direct military threat in the Middle East. Institute for Science and International Security analysis of the May 2025 IAEA report assessed Iran could convert its 60% enriched uranium stock into weapon-grade uranium for multiple weapons within weeks, while SIPRI assessed official 2025 military expenditure at $7.4bn and cautioned that off-budget oil revenues likely understate true military funding.

Threat Indicators
Nuclear breakout timeline
Weeks (est.)
Drone exports to Russia
Active / significant
Proxy activity
Very High
Strait of Hormuz incidents
Frequent
IntentStrategic objectives · Political motivations · Regional ambitions
Strategic Objectives
Preserve the Islamic Republic and Khamenei-led clerical system against internal and external threats
Achieve nuclear threshold capability without triggering a preventive military strike
Project regional power through the Axis of Resistance proxy network
Expel US military forces from the Middle East
Destroy the State of Israel as a regional actor (stated objective)
Political Motivations

Khomeinist revolutionary ideology frames Iran's identity as the vanguard of Islamic resistance against Western imperialism and Zionism. The nuclear programme is simultaneously a deterrent capability, a source of regional prestige, and a political instrument for domestic legitimacy. Regime survival is the overriding calculus behind all strategic decisions.

Regional Ambitions

Dominant power position in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen through proxy control. Permanent deterrence of Israeli military action. Prevention of Saudi regional leadership and Abraham Accords normalisation. Control over the Strait of Hormuz as a strategic chokepoint (20% of global oil transit).

Capability AssessmentIISS Military Balance · US DoD reports · CRS
Capability Domains
Ballistic Missiles
High

Largest ballistic missile arsenal in the Middle East. Shahab, Emad, Khorramshahr, Kheibar Shekan variants. Range up to 2,000+ km.

Drone / UAS
High

Shahed-136 (loitering munition) supplied to Russia. Mohajer, Shahed families. Significant export activity.

Proxy Networks
Critical

Hezbollah (Lebanon), Houthis (Yemen), PMF (Iraq), Hamas (Gaza). Strategic depth across the region.

Cyber
Moderate

Active state cyber capability. Destructive attacks on regional infrastructure. Espionage against Western targets.

Conventional Forces
Moderate

Large but aging conventional military. Limited ability to project power beyond the region. IRGC as parallel force.

Nuclear Programme
High

Uranium enriched to 60%. May 2025 IAEA/ISIS analysis assessed enough 60% HEU feedstock for multiple weapons if further enriched. No confirmed weapon yet.

Capability Radar
Order of Battle SummaryIISS Military Balance
Ground Forces
Active personnel (IRIA + IRGC)
~580,000
Main battle tanks
~1,500
Mix of aging T-72, Chieftain, M-60
Air Forces & Missile Arsenal
Combat aircraft
~350
Largely aging; F-14, F-4, MiG-29, Su-24; limited operational readiness
Ballistic missiles (total est.)
3,000+
Largest ballistic missile arsenal in Middle East
Kheibar Shekan MRBM
Operational
Solid fuel; 2,000 km range; rapid launch; used in April 2024 attack on Israel
Emad / Ghadr MRBM
Operational
Shahab-3 derivative; 1,700–2,000 km range; manoeuvring warhead
Haj Qasem MRBM
Operational (2020)
~1,400 km range; solid-fuel; named after IRGC General Soleimani
Zulfiqar SRBM
Operational
~700 km range; solid-fuel; precision guided; used in Syria
Shahed-136 / Shahed-238
Mass production
Loitering munitions exported to Russia (~10,000+) and Houthis; jet-powered -238 variant
Naval (IRIN + IRGCN)
Submarines
~19
Kilo class, Fateh, Ghadir midget subs
Fast attack craft
~100+
IRGCN swarm tactics; Strait of Hormuz; anti-ship missiles fitted
Mine warfare capability
Assessed significant
Strait of Hormuz mining; threat to 20% of global oil flow
IRGC Quds Force — Proxy Network
IRGC total personnel
~190,000
Parallel military; separate command from conventional IRIA
Proxy fighters (est.)
200,000+
Hezbollah (~45k), Houthis (~150k), Iraqi PMF (~70k), Hamas (~30k)
Weapons transfer network
Active
Rockets, missiles, UAVs, ATGMs supplied to all proxies; land/sea/air smuggling routes
Technical Military SystemsCSIS Missile Threat · IISS · DoD annual reports
Missile Systems
SystemTypeRangePayloadGuidanceCEP
Fateh-110 / Dezful / ZolfagharShort-range ballistic missile (SRBM)300–700 km450–500 kgINS + GPS, terminal optical (Zolfaghar)5–10 m
Shahab-3 / Ghadr-110 / EmadMedium-range ballistic missile (MRBM)1,300–2,000 km760–800 kgInertial (Shahab-3) → GPS-aided (Ghadr) → MaRV (Emad)~300 m (Shahab-3), ~30 m (Ghadr), improved (Emad)
Khorramshahr-4 (Qadr)Medium-range ballistic missile~2,000 kmClassifiedAdvanced inertial + terminal manoeuvringClaimed improved over Ghadr
Fattah-1 (claimed hypersonic)Hypersonic glide vehicle (claimed)~1,400 kmClassifiedManoeuvring re-entry vehicleClassified
Fateh-110 / Dezful / Zolfaghar:Large production stockpile. Primary tactical threat to Israel, Gulf states, and US bases. Zolfaghar variant with GPS terminal seeker is significantly more accurate than Fateh-110 baseline.
Shahab-3 / Ghadr-110 / Emad:Iranian nuclear-capable delivery vector (claimed). Based on DPRK Nodong technology. Emad introduces manoeuvring re-entry vehicle for missile defence penetration.
Khorramshahr-4 (Qadr):Used in October 2024 strikes on Israel. Liquid-fuelled. More capable than Shahab series. Multiple independent manoeuvring re-entry vehicles reported.
Fattah-1 (claimed hypersonic):Claimed to be hypersonic glide vehicle. First use in October 2024 strikes on Israel. Assessment divided — some analysts dispute "hypersonic" characterisation. Terminal manoeuvring confirmed.
UAV / Loitering Munition Systems
Shahed-136Loitering Munition
RANGE ~2,000 km
ENDURANCE ~24 h

Exported to Russia (Geranium-2), Houthis, and Hezbollah. 40 kg shaped charge warhead. Distinctive delta-wing, low-altitude flight profile. 50 cc engine audible at night ("moped drone").

Shahed-149 GazaMulti-role
RANGE ~2,000 km
ENDURANCE ~24 h

Larger, higher-capability MALE. Less proven in combat than Shahed-136. Claimed to carry air-to-surface missiles.

Mohajer-6Multi-role
RANGE ~200 km
ENDURANCE ~12 h

More capable than commercial-class but significantly below MALE tier. Qaem-1 and Qaem-5 PGM variants.

Arash-2Kamikaze
RANGE ~1,500 km
ENDURANCE Single use

Large warhead. Reportedly used in Houthi Red Sea campaign as anti-radar weapon. Designed to saturate and suppress IADS.

Naval Capabilities
Noor anti-ship missile (C-802)
Anti-ship cruise missile

Range 170 km; sea-skimming terminal; active radar homing. Transferred to Hezbollah (struck INS Hanit 2006)

Primary surface-launched anti-ship weapon. Deployed on frigates, fast attack craft, and coastal batteries.

IRGCN Fast Attack Craft (FAC)
Asymmetric naval platform

Swarm tactics; torpedo launch; suicide boat capability; harassment of tanker traffic in Hormuz

Iran's primary naval doctrine relies on asymmetric saturation — hundreds of FAC vs. small number of high-value Coalition ships.

Ghadir-class mini-submarine
Coastal submarine (SSK)

Torpedo and mine-laying capability in Hormuz and Persian Gulf

Small, hard to track in shallow Hormuz waters. ~12+ in service.

Sea mine stockpile
Naval mine

Est. 3,000+ mines; can mine Hormuz approaches in days; virtually impossible to clear quickly

Iran's single most cost-effective naval deterrent. Hormuz mining would immediately spike global oil prices.

Electronic Warfare (EW) & SIGINT
Jamming Capabilities

Active GPS jamming in Strait of Hormuz area disrupting commercial shipping navigation (documented incidents). Limited tactical EW capability compared to Russia/China. Primarily sourced from Russian and Chinese technology transfers.

SIGINT Capacity

IRGC intelligence directorate operates extensive HUMINT networks in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Gulf states. Electronic intercept capability enhanced by Russian cooperation. Cyber capabilities (see APT33/Charming Kitten) partially compensate for physical EW gaps.

Key Systems

GPS jamming (Hormuz/Persian Gulf), Iranian-developed IFF spoofing capability, cyber operations against SCADA/industrial control systems (Shamoon-type attacks on Saudi Aramco). Assessment: limited traditional EW capability, but asymmetric cyber and GPS jamming capacity meaningful.

Recent ActivityLast 3–6 months · Open-source reporting
2024-04
critical
escalation

Iran launched Operation True Promise — first-ever direct strike on Israel from Iranian territory. ~170 Shahed-136 UAVs, 120+ ballistic missiles, 30+ cruise missiles. ~99% intercepted by Israeli/US/Jordanian/Saudi systems. Demonstrated capability but also limitations.

2024-10
critical
escalation

Operation True Promise 2 — second direct strike on Israel, ~180 ballistic missiles including Fattah-1 claimed hypersonic glide vehicles. More sophisticated than April. Israel responded with strikes on Isfahan air defence radars.

2024-11
critical
military

Hezbollah ceasefire and HTS seizure of Syria critically disrupted the primary Iran-Lebanon weapons supply corridor (Damascus highway). IRGC Quds Force lost key Syrian basing and transit infrastructure.

2025-01
critical
military

IAEA confirmed Iran has accumulated ~10 kg of 60%-enriched uranium — sufficient for approximately one nuclear device if enriched further to weapons grade. Breakout timeline assessed at ~1–2 weeks for a device.

2025-03
high
deployment

IRGC Quds Force increased weapons and financial support to Houthis following Gaza Phase 1 ceasefire, redirecting proxy resources from Lebanon to Yemen as primary active campaign.

2025-04
high
diplomatic

Iranian President Pezeshkian and Supreme Leader Khamenei signalled openness to nuclear diplomacy with indirect US contacts via Oman channel — assessed as tactical delay rather than strategic concession.

2025-06
critical
escalation

IAEA reported severe damage at Natanz and damage at Esfahan after attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, while emphasizing the need to verify more than 400 kg of uranium enriched up to 60% U-235.

ForecastAnalytical projection · Not predictive certainty
Short-Term Outlook (1–3 months)

Iran will calibrate proxy activity around Gaza ceasefire dynamics. Nuclear enrichment will continue while using diplomatic engagement as a delaying mechanism. IRGC cyber operations against Israeli and Gulf state infrastructure will persist as a sub-threshold option. Houthis will remain the primary active proxy in the near term.

Medium-Term Outlook (6–12 months)

Iran faces a strategic inflection: proxies severely degraded, nuclear programme at threshold, and Israeli preventive strike risk elevated. Tehran may accelerate weapons-grade enrichment to achieve a deterrent fait accompli before a preventive strike becomes inevitable. Risk of Israeli strike on nuclear facilities is the single highest-probability escalation scenario in the region.

Likely Courses of Action (COAs)
COA 1

: Maintain nuclear ambiguity while proxies rebuild — buy time through diplomacy while advancing enrichment.

COA 2

is perceived — breakout as deterrence.

COA 3

COA 3: Use Houthi Red Sea campaign as primary active tool to maintain relevance and pressure on Israel while Lebanon axis recovers.

PMESII-PT Framework AnalysisPolitical · Military · Economic · Social · Information · Infrastructure · Physical · Time
Political

Khamenei aging (85), no clear succession mechanism. IRGC increasingly dominant over conventional military and civil government. Hardliner control strengthened after 2024 elections. Women Life Freedom movement legacy created unresolved social fracture. Political legitimacy increasingly dependent on nuclear programme and proxy resistance narrative.

Military

Dual structure: IRGC (dominant, controls missiles/nuclear/proxies) and Artesh (conventional). IRGC Quds Force provides command and logistics to the Axis of Resistance. Direct military capability severely constrained by decades of sanctions on conventional equipment. Asymmetric and missile forces are the effective military instrument.

Economic

Significant sanctions pressure — ~40% inflation, ~$340Bn GDP (PPP). Oil exports partially recovered via China shadow fleet. Economy structurally adapted to sanctions but stagnating. Brain drain accelerating. IMF growth forecast below 3%.

Social

Young, educated, and increasingly alienated population. Brain drain continues. Deep traditional religious constituency in rural/working-class communities. Women Life Freedom movement demonstrated scale of urban discontent but was suppressed. Ethnic minority pressures (Kurds, Baloch) ongoing.

Information

IRIB state media controls domestic narrative. Active cyber information operations against Israel (Predatory Sparrow industrial sabotage), Saudi Arabia, and US. Persian-language social media influence operations. Al-Alam Arabic-language TV for regional audience.

Infrastructure

Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan nuclear sites are both critical assets and primary vulnerabilities. Oil infrastructure critical economic node. Road/rail networks expanded specifically for proxy weapons resupply routes (Iraq corridor). Strait of Hormuz naval presence maintained as strategic lever.

Physical Environment

Mountainous interior provides natural defensive depth against ground invasion. Zagros and Alborz ranges channel any land approach. Control of Strait of Hormuz (minimum 33 km width) is Iran's most powerful strategic leverage point — interdiction would immediately spike global oil prices.

Time

Time is critical for Iran on the nuclear question — each week brings it closer to threshold capability. Every kilogram of enriched uranium is a deterrent increment. Conversely, time is running out before Israel or the US feels compelled to strike. The nuclear programme creates a race condition.

Center of Gravity AnalysisPrimary strength · Critical capabilities · Requirements · Vulnerabilities
Primary Source of Strength (CoG)

Proxy network providing strategic depth, geographic extension, and plausible deniability — Hezbollah, Houthis, Iraqi Shia factions, Hamas (degraded). Enables power projection without direct conventional military risk.

Critical Capabilities
Nuclear threshold capability (60% enrichment, ~1-2 week breakout)
Shahab-3/Khorramshahr/Fattah ballistic missile inventory
Shahed-136/149 UAV mass production capability
Strait of Hormuz denial (fast attack craft, mines, coastal missiles)
IRGC Quds Force proxy management and weapons logistics
Critical Requirements
Regime cohesion and IRGC loyalty to the Supreme Leader
Chinese oil purchase revenues as primary economic lifeline
Proxy network viability (degraded but rebuilding)
Operational Syrian supply corridor restoration (severely disrupted)
Critical Vulnerabilities
Nuclear facilities highly vulnerable to precision air strikes
Proxy network severely degraded 2023-24 (Hamas and Hezbollah)
Supply routes to Lebanon critically disrupted by HTS Syria and IDF interdiction
Internal social tensions (Women Life Freedom legacy, economic pressure)
Conventional military equipment largely 1970s-era (pre-revolution inventory + Russian)
SWOT AnalysisStrengths · Weaknesses · Opportunities · Threats
Strengths
Large ballistic missile inventory (est. 3,000+ rockets/missiles)
Nuclear threshold capability providing deterrence leverage
Strait of Hormuz geographic chokepoint control
Experienced IRGC with extensive proxy management capability
Shahed UAV mass production capacity
Weaknesses
Conventional military equipment largely obsolete (30–50 year-old platforms)
Proxy network severely damaged 2023-24
Supply routes to Lebanon disrupted
Economy under severe sanctions and inflation
Domestic stability fragile
Opportunities
Nuclear weaponisation as deterrence fait accompli
Gaza crisis sustaining regional anti-Israel sentiment
US Middle East withdrawal pressure reducing military presence
Houthi Red Sea campaign demonstrating continued relevance
Threats
Israeli preventive strike on nuclear facilities (highest-probability escalation scenario in region)
US military action if nuclear red lines crossed
Continued proxy degradation limiting power projection
Internal revolution risk if economic conditions worsen
Saudi-Israel normalisation if achieved, changing regional balance
Network & RelationshipsState sponsors · Affiliates · Command relationships · Supply routes
State Sponsors
China (political protection at UNSC, oil purchases $20–30Bn/year, dual-use technology)
Russia (limited military cooperation, diplomatic cover, political alignment)
Affiliated Groups & Proxies
Hezbollah (Lebanon — most capable proxy; severely degraded 2024)
Houthis / Ansar Allah (Yemen — primary active proxy)
Islamic Resistance in Iraq (Kataib Hezbollah, Harakat al-Nujaba, PMNF — Iraq)
Hamas / Palestinian Islamic Jihad (Gaza — links severely damaged)
Syrian regime remnants (IRGC-aligned)
Command & Control Relationships

IRGC Quds Force provides command, financing, weapons, and training to entire Axis of Resistance. Unit 400 (Quds Force) specifically manages Hezbollah. Strategic direction from Tehran; proxies have operational autonomy but not strategic independence. Supreme Leader retains final authority over major escalation decisions.

Weapons Supply Routes
ROUTE 1Iran → Iraq (Baghdad/Damascus highway) → Syria → Lebanon [PRIMARY ROUTE — SEVERELY DISRUPTED by HTS and IDF]
ROUTE 2Iran → Gulf of Oman → Yemen coast (maritime smuggling via dhow networks) → Houthis
ROUTE 3Iran → Pakistan maritime routes → secondary channels for Hamas
ROUTE 4Direct air transfers when political conditions permit (Iraq-Lebanon air corridor)
Military Doctrine & TTPsTactics, Techniques & Procedures · NATO Planning Relevance
Forward Defence — Axis of Resistance Doctrine

Iran's strategy projects deterrence forward through proxy forces rather than conventional defence. The IRGC maintains permanent presence in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, creating a deterrence cordon at maximum range from Iranian territory. The Axis of Resistance keeps adversaries occupied far from Iran's borders. Direct Iranian military power is reserved for escalatory retaliation against existential threats.

Key TTPs
Proxy maintenance as primary strategic instrument — Hezbollah, Houthis, Iraqi PMF
Ballistic missile saturation strikes (demonstrated: 300+ missiles in April 2024)
Swarm UAV tactics using cheap Shahed-series loitering munitions
Underground hardened missile city network to survive first strikes
Maritime sea denial in Hormuz using swarm boats + Fateh-110 + mine-laying
Precision missile transfer to proxies as strategic force multiplier
Known Vulnerabilities
Air force is the weakest branch — near-zero credible manned strike aircraft
Dependent on proxy networks that can be surgically degraded
Economy severely damaged by sanctions reducing defence investment capacity
Underground facilities eventually locatable via OSINT surface indicator analysis
Nuclear programme creates escalatory ladder adversaries can deliberately exploit
A2/AD Approach

Hormuz sea denial via IRGCN swarm boats, coastal Fateh-110 batteries, C-802/Noor anti-ship missiles, and mine-laying capability. Bavar-373 and S-300PMU-2 layered air defence covering Tehran and nuclear facilities. Distributed underground missile bases hardened to survive pre-emptive strikes.

NATO Planning Implication

Iran presents a NATO Southern flank challenge through proxy network destabilisation, potential nuclear breakout threatening the non-proliferation order, Hormuz energy chokepoint control, and threat to partner Israel. A nuclear-armed Iran would fundamentally alter extended deterrence requirements across the entire region.

Defence Expenditure
SIPRI Military Expenditure Database
Key Modernisation Programs
Kheibar Shekan MRBM
Operational

Medium-range ballistic missile. Solid fuel, 2,000 km range. Solid fuel gives rapid launch capability.

Shahed-136 / 238
Production

Loitering munition supplied to Russia in large numbers. Jet-powered variant (238) in development. Low cost, high volume.

Nuclear Enrichment
Active

Uranium enriched to 60% at Fordow and Natanz. Significant stockpile accumulated. IAEA monitoring degraded.

Procurement & Arms TransfersSIPRI · UN Panel of Experts · Reuters · AP
2024-09AgreementDefence Cooperation
Receiving
Russia–Iran Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (Arms Components)
RussiaIran

Russia and Iran signed a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty in January 2025 that formalised their deepening military relationship. The treaty included provisions for military-technical cooperation, joint exercises, and arms transfers. The agreement followed the Shahed drone deal and marked the most significant Russia-Iran defence alignment since the Soviet era. Western analysts assessed the partnership as a mutual arms supply arrangement: Iran provides drones and missiles, Russia provides advanced military technology, fighter aircraft (pending), and attack helicopters.

Source: Russian MFA / Iranian MFA / Reuters / AP
2024-01DeliveryBallistic Missiles / UAS
Supplying
Ongoing Ballistic Missile and Drone Supply to Houthi Forces (Yemen)
Iran (IRGC-QF)Houthi Forces (Yemen)

Iran continues to supply the Houthi movement (Ansar Allah) with ballistic missile components, Shahed-136-derived loitering munitions, Quds-1 cruise missiles, and anti-ship weapons via Yemen's western coastline. UN Panel of Experts reports (S/2023/833 and subsequent) confirm Iranian-origin components in recovered Houthi munitions including propellant chemistry, guidance electronics, and structural materials. The supply chain enables Houthi operations against Red Sea shipping and Israel despite international naval interception efforts.

Source: UN Panel of Experts on Yemen (S/2023/833) / US CENTCOM / UK MoD
2023-11ReportedPrecision Ballistic Missiles
Supplying
Precision Missile Transfer to Hezbollah (Fateh-110 / Zolfaghar)
Iran (IRGC-QF)Hezbollah (Lebanon)

Iran's 'precision missile project' for Hezbollah has continued despite Israeli interdiction strikes on Syrian transfer routes. The programme aims to supply Hezbollah with GPS/optically-guided variants of the Fateh-110 (M-600), Zolfaghar, and possibly Kheibar Shekan class missiles with sub-50m CEP. Israeli intelligence assessed pre-2024 Hezbollah stock at 5,000+ precision-guided missiles before Israeli interdiction operations degraded this inventory during the September–October 2024 campaign. Iran continues efforts to replenish stocks.

Source: IDF public statements / IISS / FDD / Congressional Research Service
2023-07ReportedAttack Helicopters
Receiving
Russia–Iran Mi-28NE Attack Helicopter Supply (Reported)
Russia (Rostec / Mil)Iran (IRGC / IRIAF)
Qty: Reported: est. 12–24 Mi-28NE Havoc

Multiple reports from mid-2023 indicated Russia and Iran were finalising a deal for Mi-28NE (export) attack helicopters. The Mi-28NE would provide Iran with a modern all-weather attack rotary-wing platform superior to its existing AH-1J Cobra fleet. The deal has not been officially confirmed by either government. If delivered, the Mi-28NE would significantly augment Iranian Army Aviation close air support capability, particularly given Iran's near-zero capacity to acquire Western platforms.

Source: Reuters / Janes / Al-Monitor / IISS
2022-09ReportedFighter Aircraft
Receiving
Iran–Russia Su-35 Fighter Acquisition Agreement
RussiaIran (IRIAF)
Qty: Reported 24 Su-35S fighters

Multiple reports from 2022–2023 indicated Iran and Russia had agreed in principle to supply Iran with Su-35S multirole fighters, replacing some of Iran's ageing IRIAF fleet. Russian press and Western intelligence assessments indicated preliminary agreement, but confirmed delivery has not been verified by mid-2025. Russia may be reluctant to transfer its most capable export fighter amid VKS attrition in Ukraine. If delivered, Su-35S would represent a transformational improvement over Iran's current fleet of degraded F-14As and MiG-29s.

Source: Reuters / Iranian state media / ISW / IISS
2022-08DeliveryLoitering Munitions / UAS
Supplying
Shahed-136 / Shahed-238 Drone Supply to Russia
Iran (IRGC Aerospace Force)Russia (VKS / GRU)
Qty: Est. 2,400+ Shahed-136 delivered by end 2023; jet variant (Shahed-238) deliveries reported 2024

Iran supplied Russia with Shahed-136 loitering munitions beginning in mid-2022, which Russia designated Geran-2. Over 2,400 units are assessed as having been delivered by end-2023, with a domestic Russian production line subsequently established at Alabuga. Iran also delivered the faster jet-powered Shahed-238 variant to Russia in 2024. UK, US, and EU officials confirmed the transfers and sanctioned Iranian entities involved. The deal represented Iran's most significant arms export in decades and established a strategic arms-supply partnership with Russia.

Source: UK MoD / US State Department / Reuters / AP / Bellingcat component analysis
ImplicationsDecision-relevant assessment · Why this actor matters
Why This Actor Matters

Iran's nuclear threshold capability combined with its proxy network makes it the most destabilising regional actor in the Middle East. Nuclear weaponisation would trigger a regional proliferation cascade (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey are all threshold candidates). Iran's demonstrated willingness to conduct direct strikes on Israel has fundamentally changed Middle Eastern deterrence dynamics.

Risks Posed
Nuclear breakout triggering regional proliferation cascade and potential Israeli/US preventive war
Direct ballistic missile strikes on Israel, Gulf states, and US regional bases
Strait of Hormuz closure — 20% of global oil, $1–3 trillion annual economic impact
Proxy attacks on US forces in Iraq and Syria (recurring incidents)
Cyber attacks on Gulf energy infrastructure (Saudi Aramco SCADA targeting)
Continued Red Sea disruption via Houthi proxy campaign
Affected Stakeholders
Israel (direct missile and nuclear threat — existential risk framing)
Saudi Arabia and UAE (within Shahab/Zolfaghar range, oil infrastructure targets)
US forces in Iraq, Syria, and Gulf (regular proxy attack targets)
Global oil markets (Hormuz closure scenario)
IAEA non-proliferation regime (nuclear threshold status undermines NPT)
Lebanon (political capture, sovereignty deficit from Hezbollah)
Platforms in Equipment Registry
F-14A Tomcat (IRIAF)Limited
FighterAir
MiG-29A/UB Fulcrum (IRIAF)Limited
FighterAir
Su-24MK Fencer-D (IRIAF)Limited
AttackAir
Kheibar ShekanOperational
IRBMStrategic
Emad (Ghadr-110 variant)Operational
IRBMStrategic
Fateh-110 / Fateh-313Operational
SRBMStrategic
Zolfaghar SRBMOperational
SRBMStrategic
Ya Ali (Yaali)Operational
Cruise MissileAir
C-802 / Noor AShMOperational
Anti-Ship MissileNaval
Bavar-373Operational
SAM SystemMissile Defence
Karrar Main Battle TankLimited
Main Battle TankLand
Zulfiqar-3 (Zulfikar MBT)Operational
Main Battle TankLand
T-72S (IRGC / IRIA service)Operational
Main Battle TankLand
Boragh IFVOperational
IFVLand
Dehlavieh ATGM (9M133 Kornet copy)Operational
ATGMLand
Toophan ATGM (TOW copy)Operational
ATGMLand
Fajr-5 (333mm Rocket Artillery)Operational
MLRSLand
HM-20 Hadid (122mm BM-21 equivalent)Operational
MLRSLand
Raad Self-Propelled HowitzerLimited
ArtilleryLand
Ghadir-class Midget SubmarineOperational
SubmarineNaval
Moudge/Jamaran-class FrigateOperational
FrigateNaval
Shahed-136 / Geran-2Operational
UAS / DroneAir
Shahed-238 (Jet Variant)Operational
UAS / DroneAir
Mohajer-6Operational
UAS / DroneAir
All assessments based exclusively on publicly available data: SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, IISS Military Balance, US Congressional Research Service, CSIS, ACLED, open government sources. For academic and policy research only.